Opus Dei Sues Game Publisher ? The Business Ethics Blog

As you may have heard, Opus Dei, a branch of the Catholic church, is suing a Danish game publisher, Dema Games, for alleged infringement of its trademark. The game is called ?Opus Dei: Existence After Religion.?

The case is pretty much entirely without moral merit. Never mind the David-vs-Goliath image raised by the thought of the powerful Catholic prelature focusing its lawyers? energies on a tiny Danish publisher. Beyond that, there?s no indication that Opus Dei, the organization itself, is portrayed in any way in the game. So this is unlike the dispute that went on back in 2006, when Opus Dei tried to get Sony to remove references to the organization from the movie version of The DaVinci Code. The issue in the present case is simply whether the organization has the right to control how its name is used.

Trademark protection is effectively a limit on free speech. You can say whatever you want, generally, but you can?t help yourself to words or phrases that are specifically used by other people for commercial purposes. Opus Dei isn?t what we would normally think of as a ?commercial? organization, but close enough: its name is the ?mark? under which it carries out its ?trade.? So it has some claim to a trademark. On the other hand, the words ?opus Dei? are just a phrase with multiple uses. As those of you who remember your high school Latin will recall, ?opus dei? is translated ?work of God.?

This case might best be thought of a question of free speech versus respect for religion. The organization can?t rightly expect to exert worldwide control the use of the two words ?opus? and ?dei,? words that have many uses in conjunction beyond describing the Catholic group. But on the other hand, should the game publishers relent and remove those words from the title of their game? Opus Dei does have an interest at stake, here, even if it?s not clearly an overriding one embodied in a right. A sufficient degree of respect for the organization and its interests might lead a company to adopt a hands-off policy, regardless of whether the trademark claim is legally enforceable.

All indications are that Dema has no intention of manifesting that level of respect, and I suspect many people ? including those who are dismissive or even critical of the Catholic church ? will applaud the company in this regard. But what is the unbiased observer to think, from an ethical point of view, about cases of this sort? Here, it is important to recognize the crucial ethical difference between a value, on one hand, and a principle, on the other.

Respect ? including respect for other people?s religions ? is a value. As such, it is something we generally want to promote. It is good, other things being equal, to demonstrate a degree of respect for other people, and arguably for their religions and the organizations that promote them. Even when we do not support or encourage other people?s beliefs, it is generally a good thing, socially, if we respect them.

Free speech, on the other hand, is a right, and respect for it is a moral duty. And rights and duties tend to be moral absolutes, rather than merely things we want to promote. As a right, free speech is something that is to be breached only under very limited and carefully prescribed circumstances. A right is a line drawn in the sand, and across which we step only when absolutely necessary. When a right (like free speech) and a value (like respect) come into conflict, generally the right has got to win.

Hopefully the Danish court will agree.

Like this:

Be the first to like this.

Source: http://businessethicsblog.com/2012/11/22/opus-dei-sues-game-publisher/

what is sopa marianne gingrich ibooks author gabrielle union merle haggard ladainian tomlinson mark wahlberg